Bookmark and Share
What is Mountaintop Removal? Audio
The audio clips in this green box are also within the main text body to the left.
Ernie Thompson on Slurry Impoundments
State of the Art, by the Lonetones
State of the Art by The LoneTones.

What is Mountaintop Removal?


Environmental Impacts
Mountaintop removal has far-reaching environmental impacts, both visible and invisible to the eye. Its impacts can be read in the landscape left in its wake - small trees dot grassy highland plateaus above valley fills, which appear as terraces formed by the hands of giants. These are the landscapes that now stand where forest-draped mountains rose above valleys and people once lived. For mountaintop removal's critics, to see the permanent alteration of the landscape brings a gut-wrenching sense of loss. However, the undeniable change in the landscape is only part of the impact mountaintop removal has on the land and people of Central Appalachia. In this section, we will explore mountaintop removal's environmental impacts, and how they ripple through the human communities and ecosystems of the Coal River Valley.
 
This page is a work in progress, and will eventually include a thorough discussion of the environmental impacts of each step in the mountaintop removal process, the cumulative effects, and introductions to important studies into mountaintop removal's environmental and health impacts. For more about the impacts of mountaintop removal on local communities, read about personal impacts and changes in lifestyles on the Coal River and the deteriorating quality of health in Prenter.
 
 
Downstream Effects of Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining
The North American Benthological Society and Environmental Protection Agency, Gregory J. Pond, Margaret E. Passmore, Frank A. Borsuk, Lou Reynolds, and Carole J. Rose, 2008
 
This is a study of the effects of mountaintop removal coal mining on biological condition in streams.  It is based on samples of over 1,200 stream segments, upstream and downstream of mountaintop removal and valley fill sites. It concludes the following
  • An increase of minerals in the water—zinc, sodium, selenium, and sulfate levels may increase and negatively impact fish and macro-invertebrates leading to less diverse and more pollutant-tolerant species
  • Streams in watersheds below valley fills tend to have greater base flow
  • Streams are sometimes covered up
  • Wetlands are, at times inadvertently and other times intentionally, created; these wetlands provide some aquatic functions, but are generally not of high quality
  • Forests may become fragmented (broken into sections)
  • The regrowth of trees and woody plants on regraded land may be slowed due to compacted soils
  • Grassland birds are more common on reclaimed mine lands as are snakes; amphibians such as salamanders, are less likely
  • Valley fills are generally stable
  • Cumulative environmental costs have not been identified
  • There may be social, economic and heritage issues.
Photo By Vivian Stockman
Photos By Vivian Stockman
 
 
Coal Sludge
 
Once stripped from the mountain, conveyor belts or trucks carry the coal to processing plants, where a combination of water and chemicals separate heavy metals, sulfur, and other non-combustible impurities from the coal. Coal sludge is the toxic byproduct of the washing process. All of the chemicals used in the washing process, the heavy metals, sulfur and other minerals removed from the coal are part of the liquid waste. 
 
The exact composition of coal sludge is unknown, and varies from site to site. It is known, however, that in addition to heavy metals washed away in the process, there are carcinogenic chemicals used by coal companies to remove uncombustible impurities from the coal, remain in the toxic brew. Heavy metals found in coal and coal slurry include arsenic, boron, cadmium, chromium, mercury, nickel and selenium. Vast quantities are produced each day in the Central Appalachian coalfields, including the coal processing plants in the Coal River Valley.
 
Although alternatives to liquid storage exist, the most common ways of storage for coal sludge are lakes held back by earthen dams and injection into abandoned underground mines.  To learn about the environmental and health impacts of slurry injection, read Public Health & Coal Slurry, which explores the contamination of well water in Prenter, W.Va., by underground slurry. Whether through the catastrophic potential of dam collapse or the slow seeping of toxic slude into well water, as experienced in Prenter Hollow, both forms of liquid storage present significant environmental and health hazards.
 
 
Ernie Thompson  Listen to an interview with Ernie Thompson.
 
 
Sludge Impoundments
 
Sludge impoundments are dams that hold back ponds or lakes of sludge. These dams are often constructed at the mouth of hollows from compacted earth and rock, shorn off of a neighboring mountain's top during the mining process. Impoundments can hold up to 9 billion gallons of sludge. In the Coal River Valley, there are two massive impoundments, Shumate, above Marshfork Elementary School, and Brushy Fork, on Coal River Mountain above Pettus.


 
 
Alternatives and Progress towards Sludge Safety
 
The Sludge Safety Project, a joint project of multiple environmental and citizen advocacy groups, notes that coal companies do have alternative ways to prep coal for market without creating slurry, but they are more expensive.

In November of 2006, the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) told a state legislative subcommittee that about 100 chemicals can be used to prep coal and that the slurry simply could not travel out of the mines where it is injected.

The DEP’s Division of Water and Waste Management began issuing injection permits in 1999, in the name of controlling underground injections. They have documented more than 400 injections into underground mines since 2000.

For more information visit: Sludge Safety Project
 

 

Sludge Dam Disasters
 
As long as they've been built, sludge dams have posed a risk to coal field residents. The devastation rought by their past failures has at times stoked the flames of anti-mountaintop removal movements, even though coal sludge is a product of both underground and surface-mined coal. The following three disasters are emblazened into the public memory, and no story of coal mining is complete without an introduction to them.
 

Buffalo Creek Flood

When Pittston Coal Company's coal sludge impoundment Dam No. 3 burst under heavy rain on Feb. 26, 1972, the sludge swept through the Buffalo Creek Hollow in Logan County, W.Va., killing 125 people.  Four days prior, the dam had been declared 'satisfactory' by a federal mine inspector.
 
Sixteen coal mining hamlets were nestled in the Buffalo Creek hollow. The flood unleashed 132 million gallons of black and grey sludge, sending a wave cresting at over 30-feet-high, upon the hollow's 5,000 residents. 1,121 wer injured and over 4,000 left homeless. 551 homes and 30 businesses were destroyed. In its legal filings, Pittston Coal referred to the accident as "an Act of God."

Dam No. 3 had been constructed of coarse mining refuse dumped into the Middle Fork of Buffalo Creek starting in 1968, and was the first of three dams to fail. Having overwhelmed Dam No. 3, the water cascaded into Dam Nos. 2 and 1, bursting through their walls and into the hollow. Dam No. 3 had been built on top of coal slurry sediment that had collected behind Nos. 1 and 2, instead of on solid bedrock. No. 3 was appoximately 260 feet above the town of Saunders when it failed.
 
 
Martin County Sludge Spill
 
Oct. 11, 2000: The bottom of a Massey Energy-owned impoundment collapsed, spilling sludge into an underlying, abandoned deep mine on Oct. 11, 2000. This incident propelled 306 million gallons of sludge down two tributaries of the Tug Fork River.
 
The Tug Fork is a tributary of the Big Sandy River, 154 miles long, in southwestern West Virginia, southwest Virginia and eastern Kentucky. The Big Sandy, in turn, is a tributary of the Ohio River.  The spill polluted hundreds of miles of waterways including the Ohio.
 
 
Tennessee Valley Authority Coal Ash Spill
 
Dec. 22, 2008: A retention pond wall at the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Kingston plant, in Harriman, Tenn., collapsed on Dec. 22, 2008, unleashing a torrent of coal ash laden water.  The disastrous, record-breaking spill flooded 12 homes, spilled into nearby Watts Bar Lake and contaminated the Emory River. Coal Ash is the solid waste that remains after coal is burnt in power plants and is often stored in water retention ponds. Officials estimated that 400 acres of land were covered in four-to-six feet of waste. Hundreds of fish were floating dead downstream from the plant and water tests showed elevated levels of lead and thallium.
 
Originally, TVA estimated that 1.7 million cubic yards of waste had burst through the storage facility and that the pond had contained a total of about 2.6 million cubic yards of sludge. However, the company revised its estimates on December 26, when it released an aerial survey showing that 5.4 million cubic yards (1.09 billion gallons) of fly ash was released from the storage facility.